Translate

Saturday, 14 June 2014

Idiot.


And the winner of the Stupidest Comment of the Week is......

We would like to remind all those who think paedophilia is the reason for the cover-up that all these hundreds of thousands of British taxpayer pounds spent, according to them, were for SY to actively cooperate in helping, consciously, a NEPIOPHILE (infant-rapist) escape justice.
Reply


Possibly one of the most ridiculous claims you have ever made. And that's up against some stiff competition.
So go on then - explain how, according to you, seeing as you believe they were all swingers, Scotland Yard are attempting, deliberately, to help an enormous group of swingers escape justice.

 Postscript

A reply from Textusa

Insane,

We will, as always, gladly answer all your reasonable questions.

But before we do that, we want to have your theory, in a nutshell, as to what happened to Maddie.

In your opinion, was she abducted? What do you think happened to her?

In your opinion, were the McCanns involved in any way?

In your opinion, why SY chose those particular areas to search?

Think of this as an opportunity to educate readers.

Once you do that, we will then provide our answer. And it might surprise you.
This was my reply to her

Nope, doesn't work like that. You are the one making the claims, it's up to you to prove them. My opinions about the case have no bearing on whether you tell the truth (ha!) or not. I choose with whom I share my opinions, and you, dear, didn't make the list.  I sincerely doubt the process would ''educate'' your readers, if such a feat were even possible, which frankly, for many of them, it isn't.
So shall we try again?
Explain how, according to you, seeing as you believe they were all swingers, Scotland Yard are attempting, deliberately, to help an enormous group of swingers escape justice?

For the avoidance of doubt, I'll make this very clear.
If I had a blog in which I made claims about the case or people involved in it, it would be a reasonable expectation that I would back those claims up.

I don't. If I ever do, I will expect to provide justification for any claims I make

Textusa does. If the claims she made were fair or established as truth, that would be fair enough. However, she doesn't present them as opinion, she presents them as FACT and frequently claims to have 'proved'or established those claims. As such, I believe she should have an expectation of being challenged to provide evidence.

Textusa's reply is nothing more than an avoidance tactic, and will not be indulged. I think the reason for her squirming is quite obvious - she is totally unable to justify her claims. This will become even more apparent if she continues to refuse.

Unsurprisingly

Not surprised. We didn’t expect you to commit yourself to an opinion. We’ll just have to keep surprise to ourselves.


 We didn't expect that you would be able to provide anything with which to back up your claims, hence these avoidance tactics.
Don't worry, Textusa, we are all quite used to you making false claims. We'll stick this one on the slate with the others.

And the next day, latest bullshit instalment

We agree with readers. Whoever is unwilling to share their position with the rest of us doesn’t deserve our company. Fair is fair but enough is enough.

Not wanting to deprive readers of the surprise we had for Insane: to turn his own words against himself.

When providing an opinion about the graffiti incident he had this to say “And I doubt very much that 'simple person' believes they were helped out by all the staff of Mark Warner's and a cast of local residents to cover up a swinging holiday”

So it’s no longer the whole of PdL, or the whole ex-Pat community but just “a cast of local residents”. <- It means exactly the same thing, you mad old bat
This is what the Portuguese say “fugir com a boca para a verdade” or “to run away with the mouth towards the truth”.

He’s slowly getting there. If he had written “they were helped out by some of the staff of Mark Warner's - a cast helped actively and the remainder with their silence - and a cast of local residents to cover up a swinging holiday”, we would say he was being quite accurate. < I actually speak English, so I would never mangle my words in this incomprehensible fashion
And about his capability to speak truthfully, this is what he has to say about having a blog:

“If I had a blog in which I made claims about the case or people involved in it, it would be a reasonable expectation that I would back those claims up.
< You walked right into that one. Unlike you, I don't make claims about the case or people involved in it - do you understand the difference? You have, since the very start, accused people of a variety of crimes for which you have precisely no evidence. You make claims, I state facts
I don't. If I ever do, I will expect to provide justification for any claims I make”

So his famous highly exclusive blog about the case never existed. What a surprise
.< Oh it exists. It is, however a factual analysis of the case where we do not make claims for which there is no evidence. And stop angling for an invite, we have a 'No Riff Raff' policy
So, Textusa's answer to the question:

''Explain how, according to you, seeing as you believe they were all swingers, Scotland Yard are attempting, deliberately, to help an enormous group of swingers escape justice?''

......is that she refuses to give one. As expected


Amusing to see the mass panic from your minions, who realise you have no answer to the question, Textusa. 
It is, however, apparent from my postbag that your refusal to answer the question, and your desperate flannelling has not gone unnoticed.
You really should think before you open your mouth. It has got you into so much trouble before. You tell one fib, you have to tell a dozen more to cover it up. You made up a story about a man killing a little girl, despite the fact that there was no evidence to support this. It's nothing more or less than your rather disturbing fantasy.
You supported your fantasy with other fantasy tales
You are not someone who comments on the case. You are a sad, middle-aged woman who gets her rocks off by writing sexual fairy stories.
You don't give a shit about who you defame, demean or disturb. Your one saving grace is that no-one takes too much notice as it is more than apparent that you are completely off your rocker.

Friday, 13 June 2014

Leave the gun. Take the cannoli.



Afternoon all. Brace yourself, it's time for yet more conspiralunacy from the pen of the demented one. It was only a matter of time before she took her inspiration from the pen of Mario Puzo, and that day has arrived. Yes, she's on about the Mafia this time, so let's see what Textusa, or Don Corloony as she will be forever known, thinks on the subject, shall we?



Class Acts

A groundbreaking mural by Portuguese street artist El Banksy. His work is not as prized as his British namesake
No, not acts of class but acts of a class: the Modern Era’s Nobility, also referred to by us as the Establishment.

Ah - the ''Establishment''. So who are they, then?


Maddie’s case is, as we all have unfortunately come to realise, filled with novelties. One of its biggest, and we dare say surprising, involves SY.

For the first time in history a police force, the Met, was ordered to solve an already solved case.
Bullshit. How is it solved? Do we know where she is? Has someone been convicted? Then it's not solved, you dozy cow.

Everyone relevant in the game, including those with responsibility in SY, knew “whodunit” when that order was given out.
No, everyone taken in by your blog believes they know. But we have a thing called the judicial system - it requires that allegations are proven



SY was given apparently unlimited resourcing to spin a story about what happened to Maddie McCann.

Before readers jump to the conclusion that we’re advocating whitewashing, we aren’t.

You are

SY was given only one condition to accomplish the mission: make David Cameron look good.
Have you looked at that great barometer of British public opinion, the Mail Online comments section recently? A new Maddie story is about as welcome as Clamydia at a boarding school

That meant that it had to achieve closure on the subject but with a degree of satisfaction compatible with the set out condition.

In other words, SY was to spin that story but it had to make sure it had legs to walk. A Prime-Minister’s reputation was (and is) on the line so if SY comes out of this looking like fools, the fact that Cameron will not be satisfied matters much more than any possible damage to the prestige of the institution
 
So you actually think that the Prime Minister said ''Get out there and find me that Maddie - I have an election to win and she's my secret weapon. Shut up, Theresa, I'm in charge''?

At first, the task seemed easy. As we have explained in previous posts, someone, somewhere, underestimated the complexity of the case. That only dawned when it was too late, when the case was already under review.

The complexity of the case has nothing to do with what happened in Praia da Luz on that night. It has to do with interests in having not known what happened that night in PdL. Not about Maddie’s death because that could be outed if it didn’t, like it did on May 3rd, involve others who had nothing to do with the death.
 
No it doesn't. It has to do with not having the faintest fucking idea where she is or who did it, but a lot of theories they can't prove

The Black-Hat
Oh, here we go...

Capi.

 
 For those not in the know, ''Capo'' is a term used to denote a leading member of a Mafia family

The interests of these are powerful, very powerful. They compete in the same league as the Prime-Minister. That’s how powerful they are. We even question if the Prime-Minister interests’ are powerful enough to compete with them.

So who are these powerful ''Black Hats'' that are more powerful than the Prime Minister, then?

And that’s the predicament SY is in. It has to spin a story that has enough credibility (or truth) that will make David Cameron look good while it cannot conflict with the interests of those that who fight the unveiling of the truth.

And who would they be?

By going with the whitewashing, SY will satisfy the BH Capi but will make Cameron look like a fool while the full truth will satisfy David Cameron but leave the Capi very unhappy.

Yes, but who are these ''Capi''?

Good sense and realism dictate that the answer will reside in between.

SY might even end up “spinning” a story very close to the truth. That will only happen if all other possible versions prove not to work.

So, unlike a normal police operation, Operation Grange didn’t have lines of investigation but only lines of acting. A true make-belief work.

Oh please don't tell me we are back to this bullshit theory that the Met went up in a helicopter and crawled all over the PdL scrubbery because they were ''pretending'' to look for evidence. Are you fucking mentally ill, woman? Seriously?

SY became actors in an ad-lib play. The script being written after the curtain was raised and is continously being changed according to the reactions of those with interests at stake to the different proposals in which direction the plot should go.

The public's reaction to what is being shown on stage didn't (and don't) matter much. It's too nonsensical so they won't even try.

The actors are being fed the lines and wondering what they're going to be told to say next.

What a load of bullshit

No one really knows what the punchline will be. Many have desires as to what they want it to be but no one knows how the play will end. No one really does.

There were 4 main lines of acting open to SY: whitewashing, re-archiving, partial truth (limited to the T9) or full truth (without getting into too many names).

We don’t believe in the possibility of whitewashing. We will sum up our reasons with just one phrase: it would be putting out the fire with gasoline.

So, in our opinion SY is currently working in the remainder 3 lines of acting.

We have explained what our opinion was about SY’s 2014 Summer Circus in PdL.

Seriously - what?

It “hired” a plot of land to set up tent and when the public (PJ) didn’t come running to participate as expected, it apparently “hired” another on the other side of town with even more disastrous results. To the point of having to leave town with heads bowed in shame.

No-one ''hired'' anything, you utterly mad cow. They submitted a request to search, which was duly approved. So they did and they found fuck all. Why is this so difficult for you to understand - are you ''challenged''?

It begs the question, if they, while in the first plot, quickly realised the operation was totally flunking as they were absolutely not captivating the PJ, why go to the second plot?

''Captivating the PJ''? It was a search, you gin-raddled old bag, not a performance of Shakespeare in the Park.

To answer that one has to differentiate between intent and physical move of props.

What?

If the move to physically go to Praia da Luz made as much sense as moving the queen front left of one’s opponent’s pawn with the words “I will check-mate you in 3 moves with the queen” and then have to endure the humiliation of having a quizzical look on his face while he takes our queen off the board.

I'll take a wild stab in the dark and guess that you don't play much Chess, Textusa?

Physically, it made no sense. Even in intent it didn’t. Arrogance never conquers. Arrogance is hostile. It drives people away.

But we understand the move. Even if it lacked any emotional intelligence it was a show of force to demonstrate how “interested” the British were in solving the Maddie case. Use the public spectacle to force PJ into collaboration.

You are literally just stringing lots of words together that make absolutely no sense at all. I hope you realise that.

The British Establishment doesn't know what (or who) PJ is investigating and it is desperate to know. Only with having someone in the investigative process (like they had in 2007/2008) will they know where PJ is poking its nose.

They told them who they were investigating, you mad bint. They got them over there and showed them a powerpoint, for fucks sake

As we all witnessed, the process in PdL to seduce PJ didn’t go well.

Seduce? Jesus, the woman is obsessed.

Let’s set the humiliation and shamelessness aside and get back into the game. Let’s focus on what really matters.

That will be the day

Let’s go back, for a moment, to when SY marched into Luz all confident and pleased with themselves

What was the reason for searching scrubland 1?

We were told there were 2 reasons.

The first, a female British tourist, who says she saw an abductor with Maddie in his arms in that area. From what we’re told she said, we confirm it has to be Maddie’s abductor as only one is able to jump out the window holding Maddie and (not) leaving the traces he did in the apartment could equal a Portuguese individual speaking British English on his mobile to other Portuguese while holding the child and then with his bare hands be able to dig a shallow grave in rock hard soil. A freshly dug grave that would go unnoticed by the dozens of people who searched every inch of those grounds in the following days looking for Maddie.

No, that was a bullshit article from a Portuguese red top

Maybe it wasn’t with his bare hands but with some sort of specially designed shoes as he apparently left a sock on site.

The second reason was, if you remember, the three crooks who lived nearby. As if anyone with capability of thinking would bury the body of a child he had just killed right in front of own doorstep. In front of his and that of his friends!

No it wasn't

We believe the mentioning of the 3 crooks was for a reason: to convey the idea that according to SY three locals were involved in hiding the body. The body of a dead Maddie.

SY thickening the plot but fundamentally pointing the finger outside the T9. To PdL residents.

This was done to convince PJ to let SY in the investigation. SY thought that by saying “look how we also suspect, like you, that all this is greater than the T9” together with biggest police operation ever put on the ground in Portugal since Maddie 2007, it would be sufficient for the PJ to gleefully open the doors of its investigation to SY.

No it wasn't

As we said, that didn’t work.

Because it never happened

So SY upscaled its “help” to PJ. They started to say they wanted to hear 8 people of interest to the case. We don’t know exactly who they are or if, for example, the three local crooks are included in this group.

If they do reside in the area, they should be included, but if they are, why search the ground first and only after that question them? The mighty SY playing cat and mouse with local crooks? Spending hundreds of thousands of pounds when very cheap questioning would get them further?

Because, fuckwit, they don't suspect the 8 of burying her on a hillside. Do try to keep up

If they aren't, then SY is interested in 11 people and not 8. We believe they are, so let's continue with the 8 figure.

You haven't a clue, have you?

Like with the mentioning of the first 3 crooks, SY was now telling PJ, “listen, to show how transparent we're being it wasn't just those 3 who were involved... but 8 who participated in hiding Maddie’s body. See how we really want to help you?”

No it wasn't

And why would SY tell PJ such a thing?

It didn't

Damage control.

SY was negotiating with PJ. Telling PJ, ok, we will accept that you involve these 8 people in the Maddie case but that is as far as we want it to go. Please let us in and we will provide you with the all the evidence you need for a T9 + 8 scenario. That way we will all be happy.

That apparently didn’t work either. So SY was forced to up its hand. Thus the “hiring” of the second plot.

Okay - let's cut to the chase, because these imaginary conversations are just getting a bit tiresome now. So let's have your evidence to support this bullshit. Or you could just admit that it's all pure invention. Either works for me
For those of you who have forgotten where it is, here is a view of PdL from the sky. Probably taken by one of Textusa's flying pigs
 
It was to desperately show how seriously SY wanted to help catch that “gang of 8” – but that gang only.

What makes us think that?

Good fucking question

Let's look at the reasons, however stupid, that were given for choosing the first scrubland: tourist and local crooks living nearby.

And where precisely were those given as the reasons?

Ridiculous but the reason given for the choice of the second is beyond that: due to the comparison of differences in terrain between the years of 2007 and 2014 satellite imagery.

First, there is satellite imagery of Praia da Luz of 2007. Maybe someone might tell this to Mr Amaral because he says he was told there wasn't any.

Second, the body was buried in 2007 and then moved? Only that would make a difference, wouldn’t it? Shouldn't the comparison - if there ever was one - have been between pre-May 2007 and those of May 2007 to check the differences?

Third, seven years is a long time. Time for weather to even out any possible changes any small grave would make.

Well, that just shows how much you know, you thick cow. A grave cut can be visible in the landscape after a thousand years, and more recent graves can be visible because of the changes they induce in plant growth over the site. So much for your research

Fourth, the resources involving such an intelligence operation is staggering. For years satellite imagery was analysed in the Afghan war zone to catch Bin Laden without much success and the British government would then spend the time and resources comparing in close detail, or

granularity, all areas of Praia da Luz. But, even if it did, SY repaid all that effort and expenditure by spending less than a day there.
You really don't have a clue, do you? Photos taken from the helicopter flight is all that would be required

So we weren’t told of any plausible reason for the choice of those grounds.

You weren't told at all. You simply made stuff up

But there is one: the water treatment station.




So what does the water treatment station have to do with the Maddie case?.

A picture with some arrows. It contributes nothing to the piece, but fulfils a contractual obligation to include a picture with arrows in each post.

Just one thing: Euclides Monteiro, who we said was indeed a person of interest to the case, worked for Sisaqua, a water treatment company.

Yes, we know this. But what does that have to do with your mad theories? Your version has a completely different culprit, remember?

Now, that is a coincidence, isn’t it? Not many water treatment companies and/or stations in the area we would say.

SY went to the other side of town to show PJ that they were willing to really, really uncover truthfully the Maddie case up to those 8. By pointing the finger to the water treatment station, SY was showing PJ they are “in-synch”. So, PJ please let SY in.

But it didn't work. PJ simply remained distant and aloof. Staunch in its independence.
 

You are deranged, madam. Quite deranged



The relationship between the 2 police forces was best shown with SY trespassing while PJ waited for 20 minutes outside for the right authorities to arrive who could force open the gate on the other side of the road from the water treatment station .


SY's mission had failed completely and neither party made any effort to hide the discomfort felt.

Oh god, here we go again....


Things in 2014 are very different from 2007/2008. Then, we are sure PJ knew Maddie was dead and who was involved in her death. No danger to the public in Portugal. UK were clealy blocking anything that went beyond T9 and what else could someone in Portugal do but take the apparently intelligent attitude of saying “It's over to you, UK, you deal with these people”.

But the British took that favour as a sign of submission and just went full out on a slander campaign against the PJ in general and Mr Amaral in particular. Now it's paying the price.
 
Which ''british''? The tabloids? Since when do they represent the country?

Not being able to get into the PJ investigation, means that Operation Grange's results are completely conditioned by it. It would be a huge embarrassment for SY to come to a conclusion and then PJ to another completely different.

We believe there were also some Portuguese who agreed to avoid anything that affected business in the Algarve by challenging the UK cover-up.

Although shame has been completely discarded in the past by the British in the Maddie affair, SY Officers are human and the humiliation they were being subjected to in PdL took its toll.

After the graffiti on wall incident, it became unbearable to work in such an environment. One thing is to perform a lame magic act, another is to perform it to an audience that’s snickering at you.
 
Do you honestly think they cared?

That's why SY pointed out the water treatment station to PJ and then left as hastily as they could the hostile stage, noting that what mattered was the information gained about the people who used that piece of land, as per

Operation Grange update.

But what has this SY Circus in PdL provided to the case?

Three important things.

First, the confirmation that Maddie is dead. To bring her back into the world of the living is off the agenda. Maddie is dead. The public know she is dead and now so do the British authorities. Only a couple in Rothley still say feebly they believe she’s alive, but their voice counts for little.
What's this - the late news? Every fucker knows she's dead
And that’s the second thing to take out of this episode – how really unimportant the McCanns are in reality (please include Clarence Mitchell with them). How can anyone still think the couple would convince the government to spend this much money to convince the world that Maddie is dead escapes us. Their silence is not the result of one of their manoeuvres but obedience to an order. They simply follow orders. Like they have done, rather disastrously we concede, since that night of the 3rd.
And?The McCanns saying the fact SY found no evidence of Maddie's body proves that she's alive is an insult to the British taxpayer. SY didn't find any evidence because there was no evidence to be found where they looked for it.
Hello? We know all this, they always trot out the same mantraAre the McCanns stating that the coming weeks and months of work to be done by SY is useless? That the “deployment which was the largest ever undertaken by UK police overseas in a case of this type”, as per
Operation Grange update, was just SY throwing money away?
NopeThey do have trial session on Monday and as their image isn't exactly inpeccable they had to say something. They couldn't on Thursday say they were sad that SY didn't find the body and then on Monday go tell the court they want money from Mr Amaral because when he claimed Maddie was dead he hindered the search for her alive.
Can't we get you on Mastermind? Of course that's why they said it, you dozy bint.
The third is that the burglar thesis (whitewashing) has just lost its legs. After hundreds of thousands of pounds spent in finding a sock, there’s no evidence to support a bungled burglary followed by a collective local action to hide the body. And they really looked for that evidence. The whole world saw SY on their hands and knees looking for it.
No they didn't
The Metropolitan Police continue to search for Joana Morais' credibility, believed to be lost forever
An image the world is going to retain for a long, long time. Especially because everyone knew they weren't on their hands and knees looking for evidence. They were simply on their hands and knees.
Yes, well, it's quite hard to search from atop a pair of stilts
To now find that evidence elsewhere, SY has to have a REALLY good excuse to justify throwing away this money and SY’s public humiliation.

Anyway, who would believe that 3 local burglars with the possible help of other 5 people were able to fool the world for so long? A story like that wouldn’t stick and David Cameron wants one that does.

Lastly, lets us focus on the graffiti on the wall. It says, translated literally including errors:




Portuguese: “OS PAIS MATARAM A MEDDI” and “POLICIA INGESA ESTUPIDOS”

English: “THE PARENTS KILLED MEDDI” and “ENGISH POLICE STUPID”

It clearly shows the anger of a simple person. Of someone who has made up his or her mind based NOT on what s/he read on the internet written by “delusional lunatics”. A very simple and very angry nobody.
And I doubt very much that 'simple person' believes they were helped out by all the staff of Mark Warner's and a cast of local residents to cover up a swinging holiday
That’s food for thought for the class responsible for all the farces, pantomimes and circus acts.


Oh, it certainly is.

So in short, the Met went to PdL, searched two sites of interest, focusing on specific areas identified from aerial photographs, found nothing significant, and went home again. This is a perfectly normal activity in a murder investigation where there are no obvious lines of investigation and not them doing the equivalent of showing their baboon's red arse to the PJ

There, wasn't that much easier?

Footnote

Joana Morais - you never had much credibility, no matter how you craved it, but aligning yourself with this utter fuckwit means you just kissed adios to whatever remained.

Oh please stop, it's hurting now.

*Gasps for breath*


This is the funniest thing I have ever read. Ever.


Peggy Henry ‏@Helenmeg
@metpoliceuk Come on Operation Grange read Textusa to understand we know what you are doing #mccann

They'll get no work done now; they'll be too busy pissing themselves.

Still, if they suddenly draft an ILOR asking the PJ to interview 400 assorted witnesses, including the late Mrs Pamela Fenn RIP, we'll know they took it all on board.

Helenmeg, I promised I would lay off you, but you seriously are one dozy trollop. Go and find something to do and stop bothering those nice men at the Met, eh?

Thursday, 12 June 2014

Ha ha ha ha ha.....



 Today's guest publication is Paranoia Weekly

Poster Cynical Al on JH who everyone can see is none other than Insane/Not Textusa, appears to be supporting Textusa!!
On bottom of this page:
http://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t9770p770-digging-to-start-next-week-continuation-of-automatically-locked-thread-update-starting-today-2-6-14


"I don't read BS much. I'm more partial to Textusa."

It couldn't be more funny.


Jesus Christ, some of you Textaloons are beyond parody
 
Hilarious response from the mother ship

    • Anonymous 12 Jun 2014 12:16:00,

      Thank you for your comment.

      We inform readers we won't publish publish anything more related to Al's musings because his views don't appear to have any relationship to ours.

      We are sure Insane will be furious with you if you've got it wrong. He thinks we are demented and deluded. Unless he has a sneaking admiration that he can only acknowledge secretly. Hmmm, let me think. Nope.

      A boy at school used to kick me whenever he could. To a 7 year old, being told by your mother it was because he really liked you seemed weird. I didn't like the boy anyway.

      Insane would probably say he kicked the girl just because he hated girls.

 
Newsflash
 
He's not me, retards.
 
Neither is the other one.


Yes folks, it's that time again.........



Tearing myself away from the thrilling excitement afforded by the sight of 40 plods, arses in the air, peering intently at a patch of Algarve waste ground, I bring you Textusa's most recent ramble, translated into an Earth language.

I may chop bits out from time to time, mainly because they contribute nothing - not just to the debate, but even to Text's own post, but sometimes because I just can't be arsed with them, the same way one skips the boring bits in a book in order to get to the shagging or fast forwards over the Jimmy Carr bits in a compilation DVD, because he's a twat.


As usual Blue = Textusa, Red = the sane alternative





SY Contradicting SY  < standard conspiraloon title, meaningless shite
< Picture of Textusa enjoying one of her hobbies - crashing and burning

SY, the pawn, has been moved on the board of this sick game the Maddie affair has become A significant move. They have now as intended, set foot on Praia da Luz, right on PJ’s doorstep, or rather, right in their living room.

Meaningless conspiraloon cobblers; pawn, sick game, yadda yadda. Huge yawn.
The world saw live, British officers of that once prestigious police force known as Scotland Yard in very disreputable positions, namely on their knees, sifting with their hands through the dirt of Luz with the pretence enthusiasm of someone who knows that everyone knows they’re pretending to find Maddie’s corpse and also knows that whoever was watching them also knew that SY knew before it started that it would be easier to find gold nuggets on that piece of land than any trace of the English girl.
Fuck me, I'm bored already. Don't be a brainless twat, Textusa. Ruling an area out in a systematic fashion, without a real expectation of finding something, is not the same as pretending to look. It's the equivalent of looking for a missing screwdriver in the cutlery drawer - until you have done so, you can't rule out that the screwdriver is there. Especially if the last person to see the screwdriver, who you suspect has lost the fucking thing and doesn't want to own up, muses that they thought they might have seen it in the cutlery drawer. In a dream. Yeah, right.

Last Tuesday, the whole world accompanied SY's public humiliation live.
The whole world watched, maybe. But the only ones reading a load of cobblers motives into it were you and the textaloons, together with the fucktard wing of the Provisional Jill Havern forum, led by Corporal Helenmeg, a perpetual Eva Braun to Textusa's annoying little dictator.

SY would take that humiliation gladly and then some more if the real objective had been achieved, which, as we write wasn’t: to seduce PJ.

The evident aloof and distant posture by the PJ agents on site indicates clearly that PJ is far from being seduced into participating in the farce.
 
Bullshit. They are Portuguese. The ''bored shitless'' look is genetic

It’s like SY was telling PJ “look what fun we’re having playing Find-Pieces-of-Maddie. It’s fun! C’mon, play with us! Look how much fun it is to get dirty! Our mums will be furious!! C’mon!” and PJ answering “Nah… nope, not interested. We’re too busy here… having fun crossing our arms and watching the clouds pass by. But by all means do continue to play alone.”

I think it is far more likely they were saying ''Oh cheer up, Brian. I know your knees are giving you gyp, but look at it this way - the missus isn't here, you're getting a tan, and there's a cold one with your name on it when we pack up for the day. And don't work too hard, I want to make sure we're out here for the group stages at least......''


If the farce was a B-movie, it would be like
David Niven playing, as he did best, the gentleman thief together with his voluptuous female partner planning to have her (SY’s officers on the ground) seduce the owner of the house (PJ) while he (Redwood and his Grange team) went up to rob the safe (PJ’ investigation) up in the bedroom.
*shudders*

Please spare us your personal bedroom fantasies, Textusa. It's bad enough thinking of Fred, and how he must suffer as it is, without you providing us with unwanted details

But in this version the to-be-seduced owner has turned to the seductress and told her very drily “Madam, do tell your boyfriend that if he ever is within three feet of my stairs I’ll have his legs broken on the spot. Now please stay clear of me, I have better things to do.”
What the fuck is she on about here?
 

Whoever was watching TV on Tuesday, must have thought it was filmed somewhere in England, or at best, in Gibraltar. SY spending a very significant amount of human, material and financial resources on something that PJ didn't show even the slightest interest in.

Are SY acting on intelligence received and if so why are they, rather than the PJ, initiating the searches? Wouldn’t normal procedure be to forward this to the country with jurisdiction, to act on it?
 
Well, here are a few clues, idiot, you might want to try to keep up. They wanted to look. The PJ said ''Fill your boots. We don't think she's there, but feel free to poke about like a proctologist at an Arseholes convention if that's what floats your boat''

One just has to imagine the scene replicated inversely - PJ spectacularly setting up camp in Leicester to examine every inch of some piece of scrubland in its outskirts with helicopters, drones, ground radars, dogs, excavators, etc to look for the body of a Portuguese girl while SY, although present, would keep their distance from what was happening right in front of them.

It would be completely ludicrous, wouldn't it? Yet, the other way around is a real scenario as we all saw it with our own eyes.
 
Er - why?
Just the fact that anything that might be found has to be reported to PJ and so become part of their investigation and not of Operation Grange begs the question – why isn’t PJ interested in finding whatever is to be found there in the first place? Isn't it interested? The answer is yes, they are interested in finding Maddie's body but no, they're not interested in looking for it there.
Yes...........are you reading this off a card? Name? Textusa. Chosen specialist subject? The fucking obvious......

SY literally doing all the dirty work for PJ while they are watching them do it.

If everyone, and we mean everyone, didn’t know it was a farce, SY would be calling PJ incompetent.

As everyone knows it’s indeed a farce, everyone just cringes witnessing SY humiliating itself.

Using again a movie reference, if this was one of those American prison ones, the PJ was only missing shotguns placed on hips to be guards with SY in the role of prisoners, on their knees, dressed in SY uniforms instead of orange fatigues.
 
Yes, we all get the ''SY down on their knees'', chain gang analogy, Textusa. Now steady on, it's all getting a bit homoerotic and you know that'll play havoc with your HRT patches
Subtitle: Policemen clean grounds in Praia da Luz (man in blue is PJ )
Guards and prisoners don’t fraternise much in those movies, now do they?
No they don't. That's because one side has the guns, and the other is in leg irons. Is there a point to all this ''Scenes from the Boxset'' musings?

We think PJ has grounds to sue SY for harassment. In the last months it has been exaggerated.

But one thing one has to give the British side is that it’s persistent. But like any determined stalker, it’s shameless but above all patient. So it will continue to harass.
 
So SY said ''We would like to come and have a look please'' and the head Portuguese honcho said ''Make it so'' and you think that's stalking?

Now, once set foot on the ground, the problem facing Britain is on how to keep SY there on foreign soil where it is not welcome and where it is made to feel that way.
I'm sure they are big boys, and can look after themselves

It the intent is, as we said to infiltrate “enemy lines”, to do that one cannot abandon the battlefield. SY has to find ways to prolong its unwelcomed stay. Otherwise they will have to go back to harrassing-by-distance.
 
Sorry, how are they ''harassing them'', again? I don't think we established that, did we?

Sure it can go over each inch of that piece of scrubland in maximum detail where it has been authorised to be, but each inch scrutinised today is one less inch to have an excuse to scrutinise tomorrow.

That’s why SY has now come up with two other locations it says it intends to search. They couldn't request to search these when they asked to search for the first one otherwise they wouldn't gain time.

And while the request for these two further locations are under PJ analysis, SY has unsurprisingly to us requested to stay an extra week on the authorised location.

We also heard for the first time during this past week that SY also wanted to check the sewers near apartment 5A with optical cables. As far as we know this hasn't been formally requested or been authorised.

The octopus trying to spread its tentacles. Anything will do. They must stay.
 
Okay - let's stop there for a moment.
 
You think they are ''inventing'' reasons to stay? Why the fuck would they do that?

But what has been requested and been authorised is not clear. We didn't know the searching of sewers around the scrubland had been formally requested or been authorised. The image above, however, could be from the roads existing inside the scrubland.

SY thinks that only through continuous physical presence it can pressure PJ into submission. Into conceding in opening the files to SY's eager eyes. Or at least allow a SY liaison officer in the PJ investigation.
Ah - that's why, is it?

You think that if they get to stay long enough, the Portuguese will say ''Andy, old friend. You have been here so long, you are practically a brother to us. Allow us to share all our secrets with you''

I don't want to worry you, Textusa, but that ship has already sailed

They have deserved it, they think. After all they have spent loads of cash on “dinner and flowers” to now come away empty handed. Well, it is mistake many men do make isn't it? Ask any woman with self-dignity.

To any poor bastard to whom she is referring - you had a close shave, buddy. Consider yourself lucky
But they face a problem. That problem is ca
lled
Mark Harrison, the British advisor who searched PdL in 2007 looking for Maddie’s body. A dead Maddie. A dead Maddie in PdL.
Yes...........go on. 

.............And go on she did. By reproducing Mark Harrison's report. So let's delete all that and cut to the bloody chase, shall we?

(I am also leaving out the bit about a bullshit report from CdM - on account of it being total cobblers)

 

*******Removed section of cut and paste bollocks and stuff so boring it would frazzle your eyeballs. And some silly photos with arrows*******


But let’s refocus on the game and what this move means.
Oh at last
Let us at this point make clear our position about SY and its investigation. Those thinking that we think the SY is whitewashing the events, are wrong. As also wrong are those who think we think SY is being honest to the bone and is after the truth.

Don't worry, no-one cares.


For us, SY has received clearly a clear mandate: to find closure on this subject.

What closure means (or indeed if the end result of this SY exercise will really mean closure) depends on what SY can do and how far it can probe into the material truth.

We are realistic and understand that it is interests involved that determine what “SY-closure” will mean. It's not sentimental things like “truth” and “justice” that determine such a thing of such political importance.

As we have said, there is a power struggle and so the weight of different interests vary in time, making the guidelines which SY will follow change. That’s why SY seems to be wavering between intentions.

Redwood is but a
Pac-Man. He, in our opinion, just does what he's told to do, goes where he's told to go and says what he's told to say.

PJ is most certainly subject to equal pressure at least it has the dignity as not to “moonlight” as actors in farces as we have seen SY do so often recently, namely UK Crimewatch”, “BinSuperBockman”, “Algarve-18-sex-assault menace” and now “SY Circus in PdL.

Too many farces in so little time.

Get. The. Fuck. On.With. It.

For us, there are 3 possibilities for “SY-closure”:
 
Only 3. Thank fuck

- leave things as they were and re-archive (abduction) as foreseen in our “
Or Stating the Bleeding Obvious 1, as we think of it

- a limited version of truth (death circumscribed to McCanns and/or T9 without exposing any cover-up) as said in our “
Rats” post (10JAN14);
Or Stating the Bleeding Obvious 2, as we think of it and which would never happen because you can't just ''decide'' someone is guilty if you can't prove it.

- or full truth (explaining the cover-up was due to wanting to protect the activities of swingers - without getting into too many names).
 
Or Insane Conspiraloon Theory 1, as the rest of the world thinks of any batshit lunacy that would require the complete co-operation of many hundreds of co-conspirators to achieve and which is the fevered invention of a diseased mind - Textusa's.


Only the last will, in our opinion, provide full closure.
 
Only the last would vindicate your schizoid witterings, you mean.

This farcical search of PdL scrubland is, in our opinion, a significant move away from the first of abduction.
 
No it isn't
It was never meant to be a serious police operation otherwise the search locations wouldn’t be announced weeks in advance, thereby giving an opportunity for possible removal of evidence. Much less by giving the visibility they did with a helicopter flying over the area now being searched and then take almost a month to act.
Yes, because anyone who has buried a body will think ''Oh crap, I had better dig it up and move it, that won't look suspicious at all.
 

It is a fact that UK is spending a significant amount of resources on this now presumed fact: Maddie is dead.

That is what has to be retained from this episode.

Overcoming the ridiculousness of this whole thing, it just isn’t reasonable to think that SY would be allowed to put up such an onerous spectacle without supposedly having a solid basis to pursue the “death” lead.
 
SY has made it clear these searches are working on the presumption she is dead and buried in the locale. It does not take a nobel laureate to work that out. Especially as they have said so.

After UK CW in October, Smithman was here to stay. After this operation Maddie is indeed dead.

For some reason Rothley is antagonistically silent.
 
You can't be ''antagonistically silent'' you daft old tart

Abduction has literally been thrown out the window.
 
No, it hasn't.

Here, SY has another problem: to explain how it came to the conclusion that Maddie is dead.
 
No it doesn't. Any police force will work on the assumption that a child is dead if it has not been recovered within 24 hours

After all, it was having reached that conclusion after a certainly laborious and painstaking process, that this ridiculous expenditure in PdL is justified.

It cannot have been on a hunch or a feeling. It has to be some sort of solid evidence as to why SY now absolutely assumes Maddie is dead.
 
No it doesn't.

Saying it was the result of a bungled burglary is not enough.
Pat Brown has come up (literally invented, by her own words) a possible scenario in which a burglar could have killed Maddie - accidental death by suffocation while trying to keep her silent.
Pat Brown can invent whatever she likes. It's a free world. Doesn't mean she is right.

On a first look it could be something SY could indeed use but Pat overlooks the exact same thing that Mr Amaral did when he spoke of the death by couch-falling accident: time needed for cadaverine to develop.
 
The minimum time taken for Cadaverine to develop to detectable levels has never been established in studies. The one and a half hours which is frequently quoted is a misunderstanding of the data.

The conversation between Jez and Gerry occurs at 21H15 and Kate realises Maddie missing at 22H00, that leaves less than 45 minutes for a process that requires at least 1 hour and a half.

Gerry and his pathetic “proud father moment” places Maddie in her bed at 21H00/21H10. He, unlike Matt before him, says he sees the little girl. He places Maddie in bed when he looks at her and identifies her as his daughter. That limits the time any burglary followed by manslaughter could have taken place.
Meaningless, for the reasons stated above. And why, if your story is that it was all made up, and they were all ''in on it'' are you discussing the finer detail of a scenario you supposedly not only disbelieve but also claim to have disproved?

As we said in a comment to our last post, when one sees a pig flying it doesn’t mean that pigs have started to fly. It means that pig was made to fly and one has to focus all one’s effort to understand how and why it is indeed flying. Because it is flying. That cannot be denied.

Whoever made the pig fly has to explain, in detail, the how and why.

Utter cobblers
 
So there you have it, ladies and gents. Something of a non-post, in which she says, over 30 feet of rambling bullshit,  ''They are looking for a dead Maddie''
 
Well, duh.
 
 

Sunday, 1 June 2014

A cautionary tale

 

Seriously?


Textusa30 May 2014 22:46:00
''Google bizarre sexual fetishes .........''

Textusa, 30 May 2014
Wikipedia has the following definition for paedophilia


Can I suggest it's probably not the most sensible idea ever to be googling these terms? At least, not if you were planning on passing a CRB check at any point in the future......

Hell hath no fury. Again.



I thought it might be a laugh to have a look at a few of her responses to other posters.

 This one caught my eye


Textusa31 May 2014 15:12:00

Unpublished anon at 31 May 2014 12:15:00

We will say it again that we will not feed any sort of fights inter-blogs, namely with JH fórum. We consider the forum as a whole as a very relevant and valuable contribution to the quest of truth.

The fact that some posters dislike us, is a simple reality of life. One cannot please all and those who try fail simply because they have gotten distracted from the message they originally intended to convey.

We are glad that the majority of the criticism we get is about form and not content. Content may be debated, form is subjective and, again, one can simultaneously please some and produce the opposite effect on others.


Oh no - you get plenty about content too. Here is some of your fan mail

''I do find the tortuous presentation of Textusa unnecessary.
By making the text so visually and linguistically challenging and with so many unnecessary repeats it has the appearance of an oracle delivered by a priestess via a randomly bolding word processor''


''The bits I bolded are supposition not fact, textusa is referring to previous explanations which are also suppositions.''

'' I have to admit, that I don't read her posts anymore. It's taking too much time to try and figure out where's she heading for ...''

''I find it literally unreadable. Literally - it defies being read. Attempting to do so actually gives me a headache.''

''I had to give up half way through due to brain pain.''

''.....the swinging theory is crazy''
 
Heartwarming, isn't it? More of that later. For now, back to the barmy one....We have assumed upfront that we are an “over-21 blog”. We accept that we don’t produce a “fast-food” product. Using that analogy, someone whose diet consists of greasy hamburgers and pizzas cannot be expected to appreciate the full complexities involved in a gourmet meal. That lack of appreciation is not the result of the chef’s fault but of the mouth of the critic.

Do you follow that? She is basically saying you are all oiks who can't keep up with her. And that you're common and eat greasy food. Such charm

But what fascinates us is the inability of people reading our long, long obfuscated literacy but are able to sift through thousands of pages of boring and complex information that is in the PJ Files. It’s like whenever “Textusa” appears on the screen a “duh” switch toggles on in their brain. Once “Textusa” is off, it toggles off and all their intelligence returns.

Ah - and the reason you struggle with her posts is because you are thick. Lovely.

If it's any comfort, I can confirm that as a general rule the ones who fawn all over her and tell her how wonderful she is are so dense that light actually bends around them.

What some have failed to understand is that when some, specifically, move against us, that attitude is to readers of the case something that only strengthens our position and not weaken it.

Uh huh. Okaaaaay
And within JH they have one of the biggest example of what we’re talking about: Tony Bennett. The man has taken criticism from left and right and sometimes in a vile and absurd manner. Has that strengthened or weakened his position before our eyes? You answer that

Well, he's floundering about like a turd in a shipping lane at the moment, Text, after his almighty fuck up on the FOI front, so yes, he's looking a bit of a twat, thanks for mentioning it.

It’s an honour and a huge compliment to be criticised by some.

Anytime, petal. Anytime.

About the retro-fitting you mention. Obviously any retro-fitting done in relation to the meals at Tapas bar only prove our point. It wasn’t only the McCanns who invented these dinners. The Ocean Club is part of the invention from minute one. It’s not the case of McCann’s change their statement but that of Ocean Club confirming outright an invented story. In the much the same way, the retro-fitting would mean the cooperation of Ocean Club in the doing.

Ah, and you were doing so well, you hadn't mentioned imaginary dinners for five whole minutes. Face it, Textusa, your theory is total wank.

Saying that they never sat all 9 at the table at one time so it wasn’t that big as is ridiculous as it comes. The reservation was made for 9 and not we’re 9 but only will be at most 7 at the table at one time. In fact, according to their statements, on the night of the 3rd, at the beginning of the evening, all 9 sat around the table.

I do apologise, ladies and gentlemen, I'm afraid she's started to gibber again. We'll have to stop it there, if we let her carry on for too long like this - well, last time she got very upset and did a poo on the carpet, so......it's okay, the orderlies have got her now.
 
We'll round off with a bit more fan mail, shall we?

''You'll never catch me saying that Textusa's blogs contain little more than hectoring, baseless garbage....
I can run much too fast..''.

 
''In my opinion it simply isn't worth the effort of trying to wade through the excessively verbose and unfriendly presentation because all you end up with is the nonsense that textusa promotes''
 
''I happen to believe that textusa spouts nonsense''
 
''Textusa her/him/itself doesn't exactly set a very good example of how you should treat people who don't agree with you. A little more humility might not come amiss - never mind a full set of brevity lessons.''
 
''I find textusa's assertion in the 'stinkbombs' post that - paraphrased - 'if you aren't a friend of textusa blog, you aren't there for the truth' really offensive and, honestly, bollocks.''
 
''if I was ever in the situation of any of the Tapas lot picking my keys out I'd tell 'em to keep my car

(I included the last one because it made me laugh my arse off)



With thanks and acknowledgements to all the posters I have quoted. Cheers.